Dynamo match play on Stefan cel Mare, Thursday, October 31

Dynamo match play on Stefan cel Mare, Thursday, October 31
I feel that, for some time, becoming increasingly popular idea that art should be made a little corner for signs that they do not know their noses. Whaaat as criticism and grim realism, sadness and anticallophile? it's pretty sad life? Here, come on, gentlemen artists do well to stick minds in the head and still leave (SCL) ifosele that nobody has to show us her new chef guarded our money as they could to their environment. Perhaps that since sprung up on the small screen with talented Romanian cohorts closet began to catch the world what's with art: if it's fun and we laugh - like! If not - huooo, next! Do not say now puritan MP who wants to ban obscenity closet and trivialities in art. Can return to it later. But the other day I read an article in Dilema Veche narcotic: The author, a (fairly) known Romanian journalist, launches an attack with verve, as the acid so ironically, to the creator of the art 'ugly' ( was to say - contemporary art, for he often put together equals sign). According to him, beautiful is what you sell, or what the consumer likes art. The rest, ie (here enumerate the categories that are put in the pillory indirectly) art sad, angst, gloomy, abstract nefigurativă, disharmony, unpleasant, closet unfunny, bleak, in a word - ugly, should be discouraged, and the creators of such horrors should be self-financing if believe so strongly in what they do, because the state, that people should not bear the costs of production and promotion closet of sad sad oprerelor who will not understand what's that "nice" and which team plays . I would like to clarify: I do not find drug content of the article, no way - I know the distinguished journalist opinion is shared by many of those who give some of their time (usually a few seconds) formulating an opinion about art. What I find unbelievable is that this article could be published in Dilema Veche. Currently on the website link does not work magazine (I wonder why), but you can read the article on the blog author. Incidentally, I found the text rather than another very similar, at least in tune with the theme as the one mentioned above, closet published two years ago in Vice magazine (in the UK, recently translated into Romanian version of the publication) and seems to enjoy a lot of popularity. The author declares that even the title "had enough to pretend, just do not understand art." And a hundred and eighty-five thousand individuals said that like. Even though the examples that illustrated the statement in the title is not relevant for contemporary art in general. These more positive reactions to the article abolishing art make me think the world (not all, but many) are kind of weird in art, be it good or bad, maybe because (art) is so giddy and feels no need to account for what, or explain. But this is a discussion that could go on forever. What I find dangerous is that such views were echoed more strongly in institutions that are directly related to art and (supposedly) should support such as AFCN and similar closet structures abroad or here , as Dilema Veche magazine. This phenomenon is prevalent throughout the world, art is just perverse appeal to those who should protect. Perverse because it is an attack justified closet and "object" is not, say, art criticism by the court as legitimate as (and thank God, it would be enough to criticize, because contemporary art is largely very bad, but not for the reasons put forward by detractors), but a cowardly attack that appeal to public sentiment. closet This public (or most of it) is made up of people with problems anyway beat their head too much because I'm busy art survive in a crazy world. They are served regurgitated idea what it is or what it should be art, and many of them swallow because it is taught - to swallow all sorts of ideas spewed by some sinister, about how they should live, what to eat, how to dress, what programs to watch on TV, what to do in your free time, you should stop taking loans to buy an I-phone they do not need, etc.. After that, the same sinister, encouraged by the success of their spitting, make reforms (that deh, asking the audience): cut or refuse funding for bad art (such as TIFF or Sibiu Jazz Festival or National Theatre Festival ) and choose to fund and promote the art commercial and / or ethnographic. Or "Analysis of urban development strategies on the Black Sea coast in 60-70 years." As I said, the phenomenon is widespread and even if the West is hiding more "talented" under the guise of promoting tourists